Angel investing in Indian startups saw a notable decline in 2025, indicating a reset for the  country’s early-stage funding scene. Changes in regulations affected how investors could  participate and comply, leading to a sharp drop in the number of angel-funded deals, even  

though investments were still being made, but in a more focused way. This new framework  has changed the way early investments are made and who can take part, which has a direct  effect on how young startups raise funds. 

The regulatory changes brought in stricter rules, limiting angel fund participation to  accredited investors, and introduced higher financial requirements along with more  compliance and reporting obligations. While these steps aimed to enhance investor protection  and market transparency, many investors felt that the increased complexity has led to reduced  participation and slower deal-making in the early-stage sector. 

Deal volumes fell significantly, while capital saw a moderate decline. 

In line with these changes, the number of angel investment rounds fell by 44 percent in 2025,  dropping to 834 deals from 1,495 in 2024, according to data from Tracxn. The total capital  invested also decreased, but at a slower rate. 

Overall funding dropped by about 28 percent, from $5.35 billion in 2024 to around $3.85  billion in 2025. The sharper decline in the number of deals compared to the capital deployed  indicates a trend towards consolidation, where fewer investors are participating but with  larger investments. This suggests a shrinking investor base rather than a total exit of capital  from the ecosystem.

Industry experts noted that recent SEBI regulations have unintentionally pushed away many  traditional angel investors. Ujwal Sutaria, Founder and General Partner at TDV Partners,  stated that the new rules have limited the involvement of experienced operators, founders,  and senior professionals who have historically supported startups at their early stages. He also  mentioned that reduced incentives at the syndication level, such as higher taxes on sourcing  fees and restrictions on profit sharing, have further discouraged active deal-making. 

Effects on startup validation and early trust 

Angel investment platforms are worried that the impact goes beyond just funding amounts; it  also affects the early-stage validation of startups. Ankur Mittal, Co-founder of Inflection  Point Ventures (IPV), noted that many companies now getting ready for IPOs gained their  first significant institutional confidence through angel investments. 

While acknowledging the need for investor protection, industry leaders warned that overly  strict rules could exclude many potential contributors. This exclusion could limit not just the  availability of capital but also the strategic advice, industry connections, and hands-on  support that angel investors usually offer to early-stage founders. 

Despite the overall slowdown, IPV remained the most active angel platform in India in 2025,  completing 46 investments during the year, according to Tracxn data. 

A market clean-up or a growing concern? 

Not everyone sees the decline as a negative development. Anirudh A. Damani, Managing  Partner at Artha Venture Fund, described the change as a necessary cleanup. He pointed out  that some previous angel activities resembled retail crowdfunding rather than real venture  investing, with very small investments complicating ownership structures without adding real  value. 

Damani believes that the removal of such participants has made fundraising more efficient  and improved deal quality. He also noted that founders who approach institutional investors  today are more disciplined, focusing more on unit economics, efficient use of capital, and  sustainable growth. However, he warned that there could be risks if compliance costs become  too high for seed-stage funds. 

Outlook for India’s early-stage funding ecosystem 

Overall, the data from 2025 shows that India’s angel investing landscape has become smaller,  slower, and more concentrated. While capital is still available, access has become more  limited, especially for pre-seed and seed-stage founders. 

Whether this regulatory reset results in a healthier and more disciplined ecosystem or creates  long-term gaps at the base of the funding funnel will depend on how participation models and  incentive structures change. For now, the trend indicates a clear shift in how early-stage  capital is being utilized in India’s startup ecosystem.